/ Home About VFF Tests Readings Study Results Other Forum Links Updates Contact |
/
Written and said about my investigation in other sources
Be Reasonable Podcast Interview 2013 Dinner and a Reading with Mark Edward
April 2010 - I had dinner with skeptic and skeptical activist Mark Edward (website and blog) and other California-based skeptical friends and decided to do a quick reading on Mark.
Susan, one of the Skeptics who was there, has posted pictures from that weekend including our dinner/reading. She posts a link to her pictures in her JREF Forum signature, so I make the assumption that it is ok for me to post that link here as well. Susan's pictures from April weekend in Hollywood.
SCEPCOP Forum comments IIG Montly Updates IIG Report on our Test The IIG on Skeptically Speaking
The Rational Alchemy Podcast www.stopvisionfromfeeling.com Also see Rule 12 at the JREF Forums
Other off-topic skeptical comments
August 2010 - THE PASSION OF SAINT MEL (GIBSON THAT IS) July 22 2010 - Comment in Mark Edward's Skepticblog I wasn't there...but.
July 2010 - Ashley F. Miller's blog TAM: For the Ladies? brings up the point of sexual discrimination and harassment against females in skepticism and at the skeptical TAM conventions. I comment here and here.
June 30 2010 - The blog titled Why I'll never return to JREF Forum or The Amaz!ng Meeting, I comment on it here.
May 3 2010 - I felt outrage when I saw skeptic Brian Dunning's documentary Here Be Dragons where Dunning places soybean products in the same category of pseudoscience as for instance homeopathy. As a college chemistry student and occasional vegan I know about amino acids and protein, and soybean happens to have twice the amount of protein per weight than does meat. It is important to be reminded of the danger of giving any otherwise credible skeptic an all-encompassing authority to speak on all matters. Brian, your major was computer science. May 3 2010 - And here I take a whack at Phil Plait's An Alien Ate Stephen Hawking in this comment, where I criticize Plait for his visions within his field of astronomy being both conventional from-the-book and for having a lack of the imagination that is necessary to propel his field forward.
Please e-mail me any links to references made to my investigation
Other cases /
|